Player Grades
Comprehensive performance analysis using our 4-component grading system
QB Player Rankings - Week 15 2025
Showing 50 players ranked by overall grade
| Rank | Player | Position | Overall Grade | Production | Efficiency | Situational | Team Success | Week |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
Indiana
|
QB |
95.8
|
92.6
|
98.9
|
95.7
|
97.4
|
15
|
|
2
|
South Florida
|
QB |
90.8
|
93.1
|
88.9
|
88.2
|
92.8
|
15
|
|
3
|
USC
|
QB |
90.0
|
83.8
|
93.7
|
93.3
|
92.8
|
15
|
|
4
|
North Texas
|
QB |
89.8
|
84.4
|
95.4
|
87.1
|
94.8
|
15
|
|
5
|
Oregon
|
QB |
89.3
|
87.9
|
90.5
|
86.1
|
94.7
|
15
|
|
6
|
Washington
|
QB |
88.5
|
94.5
|
89.7
|
78.1
|
86.4
|
15
|
|
7
|
Ohio State
|
QB |
88.2
|
78.2
|
96.9
|
88.9
|
93.2
|
15
|
|
8
|
Texas State
|
QB |
87.4
|
90.8
|
84.4
|
84.5
|
89.1
|
15
|
|
9
|
Ole Miss
|
QB |
87.1
|
87.1
|
86.2
|
83.0
|
94.6
|
15
|
|
10
|
Cincinnati
|
QB |
87.0
|
84.8
|
85.3
|
94.0
|
86.2
|
15
|
|
11
|
UConn
|
QB |
86.7
|
80.1
|
86.8
|
94.6
|
91.1
|
15
|
|
12
|
UNLV
|
QB |
86.6
|
89.2
|
81.6
|
85.5
|
91.8
|
15
|
|
13
|
Notre Dame
|
QB |
85.6
|
75.4
|
90.1
|
91.5
|
92.6
|
15
|
|
14
|
Illinois
|
QB |
85.0
|
80.3
|
90.6
|
87.4
|
81.2
|
15
|
|
15
|
Tennessee
|
QB |
84.9
|
75.9
|
89.6
|
87.6
|
93.2
|
15
|
|
16
|
Arkansas
|
QB |
84.2
|
77.1
|
86.2
|
92.2
|
86.1
|
15
|
|
17
|
Texas A&M
|
QB |
83.8
|
79.0
|
83.1
|
88.1
|
90.3
|
15
|
|
18
|
Memphis
|
QB |
83.7
|
83.0
|
77.6
|
92.5
|
85.4
|
15
|
|
19
|
Old Dominion
|
QB |
83.3
|
79.7
|
83.3
|
85.9
|
88.0
|
15
|
|
20
|
East Carolina
|
QB |
82.9
|
76.9
|
85.8
|
83.1
|
91.0
|
15
|
|
21
|
James Madison
|
QB |
82.6
|
76.0
|
79.6
|
91.5
|
92.3
|
15
|
|
22
|
Toledo
|
QB |
82.4
|
73.6
|
83.7
|
93.9
|
84.9
|
15
|
|
23
|
NC State
|
QB |
82.3
|
78.0
|
80.5
|
92.1
|
82.8
|
15
|
|
24
|
Miami
|
QB |
81.6
|
73.9
|
84.3
|
85.0
|
89.7
|
15
|
|
25
|
BYU
|
QB |
81.6
|
79.3
|
78.9
|
86.5
|
85.8
|
15
|
|
26
|
Florida State
|
QB |
81.5
|
76.2
|
83.1
|
82.6
|
89.4
|
15
|
|
27
|
Tulane
|
QB |
81.5
|
77.5
|
83.2
|
84.1
|
83.6
|
15
|
|
28
|
Duke
|
QB |
81.0
|
66.0
|
87.0
|
95.4
|
85.1
|
15
|
|
29
|
Virginia
|
QB |
80.5
|
70.8
|
78.1
|
93.8
|
90.3
|
15
|
|
30
|
SMU
|
QB |
80.4
|
68.4
|
80.7
|
95.2
|
87.9
|
15
|
|
31
|
Alabama
|
QB |
79.9
|
68.3
|
82.3
|
93.6
|
83.8
|
15
|
|
32
|
TCU
|
QB |
79.7
|
66.4
|
83.8
|
91.9
|
86.2
|
15
|
|
33
|
Houston
|
QB |
79.6
|
76.5
|
76.6
|
88.3
|
81.5
|
15
|
|
34
|
Delaware
|
QB |
78.9
|
70.7
|
79.1
|
90.8
|
81.6
|
15
|
|
35
|
Arizona
|
QB |
78.6
|
72.2
|
82.4
|
80.0
|
83.7
|
15
|
|
36
|
Georgia Southern
|
QB |
77.5
|
67.9
|
80.8
|
87.6
|
79.6
|
15
|
|
37
|
Texas
|
QB |
77.4
|
70.6
|
76.9
|
88.0
|
79.8
|
15
|
|
38
|
Clemson
|
QB |
76.8
|
69.7
|
78.9
|
84.6
|
78.9
|
15
|
|
39
|
Missouri State
|
QB |
76.7
|
65.9
|
84.7
|
87.0
|
72.4
|
15
|
|
40
|
Rutgers
|
QB |
76.3
|
63.7
|
85.9
|
81.3
|
80.0
|
15
|
|
41
|
San José State
|
QB |
75.1
|
64.9
|
79.2
|
86.3
|
75.8
|
15
|
|
42
|
Hawai'i
|
QB |
75.1
|
64.4
|
75.8
|
88.5
|
80.7
|
15
|
|
43
|
UTSA
|
QB |
75.0
|
66.2
|
72.7
|
86.3
|
84.9
|
15
|
|
44
|
Baylor
|
QB |
74.6
|
58.4
|
80.5
|
87.8
|
82.8
|
15
|
|
45
|
Oklahoma
|
QB |
73.8
|
59.9
|
74.8
|
94.6
|
76.5
|
15
|
|
46
|
Arkansas State
|
QB |
72.4
|
69.1
|
68.7
|
80.1
|
77.0
|
15
|
|
47
|
Eastern Michigan
|
QB |
71.7
|
58.3
|
75.1
|
89.2
|
73.0
|
15
|
|
48
|
Maryland
|
QB |
69.9
|
59.3
|
73.5
|
83.8
|
68.8
|
15
|
|
49
|
Florida Atlantic
|
QB |
68.2
|
54.1
|
71.2
|
78.7
|
81.0
|
15
|
|
50
|
UAB
|
QB |
68.0
|
47.2
|
78.1
|
81.1
|
78.8
|
15
|
Grade Components
Raw Production (35%)
Completion %, yards per attempt, TD/INT ratio, total TDs, rushing efficiency
Efficiency (30%)
Adjusted YPA, success rate, explosive plays, negative play rate
Situational (20%)
3rd down conversion, red zone efficiency, late game performance
Team Success (15%)
Team scoring, win correlation, opponent strength adjustments