Player Grades
Comprehensive performance analysis using our 4-component grading system
QB Player Rankings - Week 10 2025
Showing 50 players ranked by overall grade
| Rank | Player | Position | Overall Grade | Production | Efficiency | Situational | Team Success | Week |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
Indiana
|
QB |
98.1
|
95.5
|
99.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
10
|
|
2
|
Vanderbilt
|
QB |
93.7
|
93.6
|
94.3
|
94.2
|
92.2
|
10
|
|
3
|
Ohio State
|
QB |
91.9
|
85.7
|
96.7
|
93.3
|
94.8
|
10
|
|
4
|
USC
|
QB |
91.8
|
86.6
|
94.9
|
98.8
|
88.6
|
10
|
|
5
|
Washington
|
QB |
91.5
|
97.3
|
94.1
|
82.1
|
85.4
|
10
|
|
6
|
UNLV
|
QB |
88.5
|
93.0
|
81.7
|
89.3
|
90.8
|
10
|
|
7
|
Arkansas
|
QB |
88.3
|
82.3
|
89.2
|
97.8
|
87.9
|
10
|
|
8
|
Notre Dame
|
QB |
88.0
|
78.6
|
90.7
|
97.7
|
91.8
|
10
|
|
9
|
Cincinnati
|
QB |
88.0
|
85.3
|
88.2
|
96.1
|
83.1
|
10
|
|
10
|
Illinois
|
QB |
88.0
|
82.4
|
94.0
|
92.1
|
83.7
|
10
|
|
11
|
UConn
|
QB |
87.8
|
82.4
|
84.6
|
100.0
|
90.2
|
10
|
|
12
|
Texas A&M
|
QB |
87.5
|
85.6
|
83.1
|
97.6
|
87.3
|
10
|
|
13
|
North Texas
|
QB |
87.5
|
78.3
|
93.1
|
88.9
|
95.7
|
10
|
|
14
|
Old Dominion
|
QB |
86.3
|
84.7
|
85.4
|
91.3
|
85.3
|
10
|
|
15
|
Kansas
|
QB |
86.2
|
82.6
|
89.3
|
93.9
|
78.4
|
10
|
|
16
|
Alabama
|
QB |
86.0
|
77.5
|
88.2
|
100.0
|
83.0
|
10
|
|
17
|
South Florida
|
QB |
85.9
|
83.5
|
81.8
|
94.9
|
87.9
|
10
|
|
18
|
Virginia
|
QB |
85.1
|
79.2
|
80.8
|
96.0
|
93.1
|
10
|
|
19
|
Tennessee
|
QB |
84.8
|
76.8
|
89.2
|
90.3
|
87.7
|
10
|
|
20
|
Texas State
|
QB |
84.8
|
83.0
|
82.3
|
89.5
|
87.7
|
10
|
|
21
|
NC State
|
QB |
84.1
|
80.6
|
82.6
|
96.9
|
78.5
|
10
|
|
22
|
Ole Miss
|
QB |
83.9
|
83.6
|
80.2
|
87.3
|
87.2
|
10
|
|
23
|
Southern Miss
|
QB |
83.5
|
81.6
|
81.5
|
95.2
|
76.7
|
10
|
|
24
|
Duke
|
QB |
83.3
|
66.5
|
89.1
|
100.0
|
88.7
|
10
|
|
25
|
Delaware
|
QB |
82.6
|
72.3
|
83.0
|
99.5
|
83.1
|
10
|
|
26
|
TCU
|
QB |
81.6
|
68.6
|
83.7
|
100.0
|
83.1
|
10
|
|
27
|
Miami
|
QB |
81.2
|
70.0
|
82.8
|
93.3
|
87.9
|
10
|
|
28
|
East Carolina
|
QB |
81.2
|
72.2
|
83.9
|
86.3
|
89.8
|
10
|
|
29
|
Kansas State
|
QB |
81.0
|
77.2
|
75.4
|
99.1
|
76.8
|
10
|
|
30
|
Texas
|
QB |
80.9
|
76.1
|
78.6
|
92.1
|
81.6
|
10
|
|
31
|
Clemson
|
QB |
80.0
|
75.5
|
81.6
|
86.7
|
78.2
|
10
|
|
32
|
Baylor
|
QB |
79.2
|
64.6
|
82.6
|
95.2
|
85.4
|
10
|
|
33
|
Nebraska
|
QB |
78.9
|
64.4
|
89.0
|
89.7
|
77.8
|
10
|
|
34
|
SMU
|
QB |
78.1
|
63.7
|
79.7
|
100.0
|
79.4
|
10
|
|
35
|
Arizona
|
QB |
78.0
|
72.9
|
80.1
|
84.6
|
76.9
|
10
|
|
36
|
New Mexico
|
QB |
77.4
|
66.4
|
83.3
|
85.3
|
80.8
|
10
|
|
37
|
San José State
|
QB |
77.2
|
68.4
|
80.5
|
88.9
|
75.7
|
10
|
|
38
|
Boise State
|
QB |
76.8
|
60.0
|
80.2
|
93.9
|
86.2
|
10
|
|
39
|
Oklahoma
|
QB |
76.5
|
62.3
|
79.0
|
99.1
|
74.5
|
10
|
|
40
|
Rutgers
|
QB |
74.9
|
60.7
|
84.1
|
82.5
|
79.8
|
10
|
|
41
|
Hawai'i
|
QB |
74.8
|
65.7
|
74.2
|
89.7
|
77.6
|
10
|
|
42
|
Mississippi State
|
QB |
74.3
|
64.5
|
78.4
|
78.3
|
83.7
|
10
|
|
43
|
Maryland
|
QB |
73.8
|
67.9
|
73.0
|
86.1
|
72.3
|
10
|
|
44
|
Iowa State
|
QB |
73.6
|
55.7
|
80.4
|
91.7
|
77.8
|
10
|
|
45
|
Eastern Michigan
|
QB |
73.5
|
64.5
|
74.8
|
93.3
|
65.3
|
10
|
|
46
|
Louisville
|
QB |
70.7
|
46.5
|
76.3
|
93.3
|
85.8
|
10
|
|
47
|
Arkansas State
|
QB |
68.6
|
65.5
|
62.7
|
83.3
|
67.7
|
10
|
|
48
|
Florida Atlantic
|
QB |
66.9
|
55.6
|
67.6
|
81.2
|
72.8
|
10
|
|
49
|
Middle Tennessee
|
QB |
64.2
|
49.7
|
65.0
|
89.4
|
62.8
|
10
|
|
50
|
California
|
QB |
64.0
|
36.5
|
71.5
|
95.2
|
71.9
|
10
|
Grade Components
Raw Production (35%)
Completion %, yards per attempt, TD/INT ratio, total TDs, rushing efficiency
Efficiency (30%)
Adjusted YPA, success rate, explosive plays, negative play rate
Situational (20%)
3rd down conversion, red zone efficiency, late game performance
Team Success (15%)
Team scoring, win correlation, opponent strength adjustments